Legal Opinion

United States v. Kahan

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 21, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff United States of America moves for summary judgment against defendants Jesse Kahan and Empire Mutual Insurance Co. Pursuant to General Rule 9(g) of this court the movant has annexed to its notice of motion a statement of the material facts as to which it contends there exists no genuine issue to be tried.

The defendants do not annex to their opposing papers any statement pursuant to said General Rule as to which they contend there exists a genuine issue to be tried.

Hence, under General Rule 9(g), the facts set forth in the movant’s statement aforesaid are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Railroad Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, and Cross-Appellant, and Mary Lou MintzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Dianne RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API