Legal Opinion

State v. Sternoff

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1964No. 36893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Appellants owned approximately 24 acres of undeveloped industrial property in King County, Washington. They appeal from a judgment entered in an eminent domain proceeding appropriating and fixing compensation for 14 acres of their tract. Error is assigned to rulings of the trial court precluding submission, in the condemnation action, of a claim for damages purportedly arising from imposition of a so-called “freeze order” upon the property pursuant to RCW 47.28.025 and 47.28.026. These statutes provide:

“Whenever any authority in behalf of the state shall establish the location, width and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sternoff v. SUP'R CT. FOR KING CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. Smithrock Quarry, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. LawsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. CoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CostichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. State v. CostichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API