Legal Opinion

Boyd Construction Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. T. L. James & Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1973No. 72-1582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:

This diversity action stems from a dredging subcontract between plaintiff Boyd Construction Company and defendant T. L. James & Company, Inc. The District Judge decided that James delayed an unreasonable time in completing the subcontract and awarded damages to Boyd. The District Judge denied, as unsupported by the evidence, James’s counterclaims (1) for additional quantum meruit compensation due to the difficulties of dredging the materials encountered and (2) for standby costs. James appeals from the award in favor of Boyd and from the denial of its counterclaims.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. W. F. Chaney v. City of Galveston, Earl J. Smith & Co., Inc. v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Clyde O. Williams v. National Surety CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doris Holbrook v. Henry C. Pitt, and Third-Party v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Third- PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Deer Creek Const. Co., Inc. v. PetersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. United States v. Tug RamrodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. No. 73--3984Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API