Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. Plainview
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OR THE STATE OR MINNESOTA. By an act of the legislature of the State of Minnesota, approved. March 5,1877, (General Laws of Minnesota of 1877, c. 106,) it was • enacted, by sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 thereof, as is printed in the margin.1 Purporting to proceed under sections 4 and Y of that-act, the Plain-view Railroad Company, a Minnesota corporation, on the 31st of January, 1878, delivered to the town clerk of the town of Plain view a proposition in…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OR THE STATE OR MINNESOTA. By an act of the legislature of the State of Minnesota, approved. March 5,1877, (General Laws of Minnesota of 1877, c. 106,) it was • enacted, by sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 thereof, as is printed in the margin.1 Purporting to proceed under sections 4 and Y of that-act, the Plain-view Railroad Company, a Minnesota corporation, on the 31st of January, 1878, delivered to the town clerk of the town of Plain view a proposition in writing, signed by the president and secretary of the company, containing the statements and specifications required by…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchfobd
To-present a Federal question on the ground that full faith and credit were not given by the state court to the judgments of the Circuit Court of the United States in the Marshall and Ilsley cases, it must appear that the state court denied to the plaintiff in error, within the terms of § 709 of the Revised Statutes, “some title, right, privilege or immunity” held by the plaintiff in error under the judgments of the Circuit Court of the United States in those cases, and claimed by it in the state court under the Constitution or a statute of the United States; and that the decision of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Dupasseur v. RochereauSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Loeber v. SchroederSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Meyer v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Missouri & Kansas Interurban R. Co. v. City of Olathe (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.