Legal Opinion

Haithcock v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1926No. 8 Div. 400PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

This is not a case for the affirmative charge. A still complete in proximity to defendant’s home; a plain beaen path, freshly usad, leading from the still to defendant’s house; the still recently in use, and with beer in barrels ready to be run into whisky; the still smutty from recent use; overalls in defendant’s house with fresh smut and still slop on them; vessels in defendant’s house recently containing whisky, the product of a still; the absence of any testimony tending to fix guilt on any other person. The facts proven presented a question for the jury. The affirmative charge was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fox v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lowery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API