Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Elliott
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 25, 1993No. Nos. 89-5457, 89-5528PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
In the initial opinion in this case, Securities and Exchange Com’n v. Elliott, 953 F.2d 1560 (11th Cir.1992), we retained jurisdiction over a single unresolved issue in order to certify a question to the Florida Supreme Court. Claimants Howard Dore, Ruth Dore, Gerald J. Braun, Christie Braun, and Monica Brooke Braun had challenged the district court’s finding that tax certificates which they held as collateral for a loan made to defendant Charles Elliott were general intangibles under Article 9 of the Florida Uniform Commercial Code, Ch. 679 Fla.Stat. (1991). Applying the Uniform Commercial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,549, 18 Ucc rep.serv.2d 588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Phillip Elliott, Charles O. Farrar, Receiver-Appellee, Kenneth J. Davis, Linda J. Davis, Leroy H. Moeller, as Personal Representative of the Estates of Adolph Hagstrom, Squire J. Kingston, Elizabeth Woods, Caroline Estelle, Lynnis H. McClain Ted Masco, Anita K. Hailey, Earl Setterblade, Francis Setterblade, Lloyd Schutzman, Shirley Schutzman, Albert C. Heil, Melvin Burkhardt, Rosa Ella Burkhardt, Howard Dore, Ruth Dore, Gerald J. Braun, Christie Braun, Monica Brooke Braun, C. Albert Ducharme Trust and Catherine F. Ducharme Trust, Seaton F. McDaniel Josephine McDaniel Trudy and Sidney Kleiner, Claimants-Appellants. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Phillip Elliott, Charles O. Farrar, Receiver-Appellee, Melvin Burkhardt and Rosa Ella Burkhardt, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ElliottSupreme Court of Florida · 1993