Arnold v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Clinton Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtErazer, J.
This was a prosecution for assault and battery. There was a jury trial, and conviction below.
The court below, (an attorney occupying the bench to try the cause) instructed the jury as follows: “A reasonable doubt as to any material fact must be such a doubt that convinces you that the fact does not exist. Perhaps in. this I may have given you the law a little too strong. I will modify it by saying this, If there is a reasonable doubt that arises in your minds, that convinces you that the fact is not as charged, you may acquit.”
This was an error.. A doubt never convinces. A reasonable doubt…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Miles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bradley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Polin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Densmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.