Legal Opinion

Sud v. Morris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1973No. 7465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

Plaintiff below brought suit to recover usurious interest paid and defendants answered by a plea in abatement alleging that there were other necessary parties who were not joined as parties plaintiff. The trial court sustained the plea in abatement, gave the plaintiff fifteen days within which to make such persons parties plaintiff and, upon plaintiff declining to comply therewith, dismissed the cause.

Plaintiff alleged that in July, 1970, he and MPS Production Company, jointly and severally, executed a promissory note in an amount in excess of five hundred thousand dollars…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. TyraTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. GoodnightTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  5. Farrier v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moody v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Hartnett v. Adams & Holmes Mortgage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Wagner v. AUSTIN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API