Legal Opinion

Corkum v. Lenske

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that defendant had converted to his own use money which defendant had held for plaintiff in a fiduciary capacity. Defendant answered with a plea in abatement which alleged that the same subject matter was included in a suit for accounting which plaintiff had previously filed against defendant and other related parties. The trial court, after a hearing, sustained the plea in abatement and entered a judgment which dismissed this action. Plaintiff appeals from that judgment.

Plaintiff contends that the plea of abatement should not be sustained because the parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fur & Wool Trading Co. v. George I. Fox, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. TURNER v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Agri-Link Corp. v. SchmitzOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Nielsen v. FerrenburgOregon Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API