S3 Incorporated, (Now Known as Sonicblue, Inc.) v. Nvidia Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentGajarsa, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. It concludes that the district court erroneously held that claims 1-4 and 9-11 of the '279 patent are indefinite. Contrary to the majority, I would affirm the district court’s determination.
The majority finds that the claims are definite. However, an astute reading of the claims clearly establishes that the term “video information data stream” renders their scope and meaning ambiguous. Reference to the intrinsic evidence fails to rectify this ambiguity, and the majority’s speculative and illusive analysis of the written description to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. v. Zebco Corporation and Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Acs Hospital Systems, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Montefiore Hospital and Wells National Services Corporation, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atmel Corporation v. Information Storage Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.