Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2004No. 49A02-0402-CR-114PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

LaMar Williams was found guilty by a jury of possession of cocaine as a Class C felony, resisting law enforcement as a Class D felony, battery as a Class A misdemeanor, and resisting law enforcement as a Class A misdemeanor. Williams now appeals his convictions and sentences. We affirm.

Issues

Williams raises three issues for our review, which we restate as the following:

1. Whether the trial court properly overruled Williams' Batson challenge;

2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain Williams' convictions; and

3. Whether the trial court properly sentenced…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Powell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Forrest v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Riehle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Pennington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Muncy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Bell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API