United States v. All American Airways, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal is from a consent judgment— a judgment which was consented to by appellant and appellee, and which the District Court had jurisdiction to render. Such a judgment is not reversible. Pacific R. R. v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289, 295, 25 L.Ed. 932; United States v. Babbitt, 104 U.S. 767, 768, 26 L.Ed. 921; Ballot v. United States, 1 Cir., 171 F. 404, 405; Curry v. Curry, 65 App.D.C. 47, 79 F.2d 172, 174; In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 100 F.2d 7, 8. See, also, Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States, 113 U.S. 261, 266, 5 S.Ct. 460, 28 L.Ed. 971; Swift & Co. v. United…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Pacific Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. BabbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Curry v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart v. Lincoln-Douglas Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Pacific National Bank v. MountIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Slaven v. American Trading Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Pacific National Bank of Washington v. MountIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Slaven v. American Trading Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.