De Stasio v. Janssen Dairy Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Evidence that a plaintiff, in an action for negligence growing out of the operation of an automobile, has been previously convicted for a traffic infraction as defined by the Vehicle and Traffic Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 71), shall not be received to affect his credibility when a witness in an action or proceeding, and he may not be required to disclose a conviction therefor (Civ. Prac. Act, § 355).
Plaintiff was repeatedly required to disclose such previous convictions. In a case as close as this such error cannot be disregarded.
The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Hart v. MealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Como v. BastollaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Walther v. News Syndicate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949