Legal Opinion

De Stasio v. Janssen Dairy Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Evidence that a plaintiff, in an action for negligence growing out of the operation of an automobile, has been previously convicted for a traffic infraction as defined by the Vehicle and Traffic Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 71), shall not be received to affect his credibility when a witness in an action or proceeding, and he may not be required to disclose a conviction therefor (Civ. Prac. Act, § 355).

Plaintiff was repeatedly required to disclose such previous convictions. In a case as close as this such error cannot be disregarded.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Hart v. MealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Como v. BastollaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Walther v. News Syndicate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API