Larson v. G.R.H.

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] G.R.H. appeals a district court order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] G.R.H. was civilly committed as a sexually dangerous individual in 2004, and we affirmed the district court’s commitment order. Matter of G.R.H., 2006 ND 56, ¶ 3, 711 N.W.2d 587. He requested a discharge hearing in 2005 while this Court was reviewing his initial commitment, but no action was taken on that request pending our decision in the initial matter. In 2006, his next request for discharge was heard and denied by the…