Belk v. Estes & Co.

Simmons, Justice.

The plaintiff in error (the claimant) insisted on but one ground of tbe motion for a new trial, to wit, tbat “tbe court erred in refusing to dismiss the levy on tbe ground tbat tbe same was too uncertain, indefinite and vague.” Tbe entry of levy was as follows:

“ Georgia, Marion county. I have this day levied the within fi. fa. on the life estate of D. Y. Belk, one of the defendants, in lots of land numbers 103, 104, 105 and 120 in the 4th district of said county, all that portion of said lots lying and being south of the road leading from Brantley, said county, by way of. New…