Legal Opinion

Roland Associates, Inc. v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1972No. 7321PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Pierce, et al, were the owners of a commercial building which was rented to the defendant, Roland Associates. The building was damaged by fire and plaintiffs brought suit to recover the damage done to their building. Trial was to a jury and upon findings invoking the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, judgment was rendered for plaintiffs’ damage as found by the jury. Defendant made no objections to the court’s charge but contends upon appeal that there was no evidence to sustain the jury’s findings to the cluster of issues submitting res ipsa loquitur. By the second…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Leyva v. PachecoTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lynch v. RickettsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jerry K. Simpson v. Home Petroleum Corporation and Home Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. H. E. B. Food Stores v. MercadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API