Legal Opinion

State v. Arnett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 24, 1990No. 88CR-1524, 88CR-1707; CA A50650PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

In trial court case number 88CR-1524, defendant was convicted for manufacturing and possessing a controlled substance, first degree burglary, second degree theft; in trial court case number 88CR-1707, he was convicted for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 164.045; ORS 164.225; ORS 475.992(1) and (4). On appeal, he argues that the court erred in not granting a part of his motion to suppress evidence obtained in a search of his house1 for evidence of the burglary, including evidence that was used to convict him of manufacturing and possessing a controlled substance. He also argues that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. PellerOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. VerdineOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API