Legal Opinion
New York Chinese TV Programs, Inc. v. U.E. Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 24, 1994No. 88 Civ. 4170 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Applicant-Intervenors David Doo, Tehwa Mu and Steven Cheng (collectively, the “Applicants”) appeal from the order of Magistrate Judge Kathleen Roberts denying their motion to intervene, pursuant to Rule 24, Fed.R.Civ.Pro., in this action. For the reasons set forth below, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is affirmed.
Parties
Plaintiff New York Chinese TV Programs Inc. (“New York Chinese”) is a New York Corporation, originally owned by five shareholders each of whom owned 20% of its shares. New York Chinese distributes Mandarin language videotapes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- New York News, Inc. v. KheelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- New York Chinese TV Programs, Inc. v. U.E. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- R & G Mortgage Corp. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. San Juan Cable, LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Ny Chinese Tv v. U.E. Enterprises IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994