Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1970No. Appeal, 120; Appeal, 525PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

These appeals raise related questions concerning the procedure a common pleas judge must follow when he is acting as a committing magistrate The facts are as follows:

Bose was tried on June 20, and 21, 1967 before a judge and jury on an indictment charging fornication and bastardy. Bose testified he could not have engaged in intercourse with the prosecutrix at the time of the alleged conception because at that time he was attending a training course with the Army National Guard in Maryland. In rebuttal, the Commonwealth called a National Guard officer who testified…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. DiDio v. BaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Fisher v. StitzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Bittner v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Gordy v. LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. MayberrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. BrocklehurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API