Legal Opinion

Bayless v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 12, 2014No. 12-4120PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, District Judge.

Sixteen years ago Carolyn Bayless began to suffer from a mysterious debilitating illness. As her condition deteriorated over the years that followed, she doggedly sought to learn what caused (and how to treat) her illness. Finally, in 2008, convinced that she was the victim of exposure to nerve gas emitted by an Army testing facility, she filed a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. When this lawsuit followed in 2009, the Army responded that she knew of her claim by at least 2005 and had waited too long to assert it. The district court agreed and granted summary…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Kronisch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Victoria Rosales Jesus Rosales Rebecca Rosales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bluel v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  2. Client Solutions Architects, LLC v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Edgett v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
  4. Greger v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
  5. Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API