Legal Opinion

Bigham v. National Brookville Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1928No. 13,095PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Action by appellee against appellant for damages. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee.

The only proper specifications in the assignment of errors are that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to strike out part of the complaint, and in overruling his motion for a new trial.

It is not reversible error to overrule a motion to strike out part of a pleading. Guenther v. Jackson (1920), 73 Ind. App. 162, 126 N. E. 873; Eagle Lake Ice Co. v. Munson (1920), 73 Ind. App. 496, 127 N. E. 839.

• The contention that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guenther v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Shaw v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Eagle Lake Ice Co. v. MunsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacKey v. Pachter, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. WellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API