Taylor v. Lantz
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The plaintiff, Derrick Taylor, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Theresa C. Lantz, Jeffrey E. McGill, Suzanne Ducate, Fred Levesque and Mary M. Marcial. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) there were no genuine issues of material fact and (2) the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff; see, e.g., Rodriguez v. Testa, 296 Conn. 1, 6, 993 A.2d 955 (2010); the record reveals the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Trotta v. Town of BranfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Charles C. Williams v. City of Hartford, ET AL.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026