Reed v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 48, March T., 1917, by defendant, from order of C. P. Luzerne Go., Oct. T., 1916, No. 1676, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Charles Reed v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company of Saint Paul, Minnesota. Assumpsit upon a policy of fire insurance. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 48, March T., 1917, by defendant, from order of C. P. Luzerne Go., Oct. T., 1916, No. 1676, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Charles Reed v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company of Saint Paul, Minnesota. Assumpsit upon a policy of fire insurance. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. From the record it appeared that two suits were brought against the defendant company, one by Charles Reed, the mortgagee of the property, and the second by Alexander Buzitski, owner. The defendant filed…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
After careful examination of the record in this case, we conclude that the reasons given by the court below fully justify the conclusion reached, and that from every possible point of view, legal and equitable, the defendant ought to pay the mortgage; and that the rule to show cause why judgment should not be entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense was properly made absolute.
The judgment is affirmed.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Overholt Et Ux. v. Reliance Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Clarke & Cohen v. Real Ex Rel. Stroudsburg Nat. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Bowers Co. v. London Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. CrutchfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Miners Savings Bank v. Merchants Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.