Shove v. Martine
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Redwood county to recover $1,195, and interest, upon two promissory notes. The case was tried before Webber, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $163.63. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
To justify an affirmance of the order appealed from, it is only necessary to state the salient features of the case as they appeared at the trial, as follows: Prior to September, 1896, one Kyle and the defendant’s husband were engaged in the mercantile business at Cottonwood, Minnesota, as copartners. They were also selling goods on commission for a number of manufacturers and wholesale houses. This was, in fact, a part of their business as copartners. Some disagreement having arisen, negotiations were entered into by them looking toward a dissolution and to a settlement of all copartnership…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. MussetterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Hanley v. NoyesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Hurley v. BendelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Hanson v. BeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by5 opinions
- Security National Bank of Minneapolis v. PulverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Lewis v. BehSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Tiedt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Beiró v. HermanosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1918
- Beiró v. Rovira Bros.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1918