Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Allen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court cited Von Phul vs. Penn, 31 Mo., 333 ; Rutherford vs. Ullman, 42 Mo., 218.

1Opinion of the Court

Wagner. Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action brought under the provisions of the statute (Wagn. Stat., 1022, § 53), to compel defendant to institute a suit for certain real estate, which, it was alleged, he set up some claim to. An order having been made by the court, and summons issued and served, the defendant appeared and stated in his answer that he did claim the property adversely to the plaintiff, and there was a denial that plaintiff was, or ever had' been in the possession of the premises.

*582The cause was submitted to the court without'the intervention of a jury,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Von Phul v. PennSupreme Court of Missouri · 1861
  2. Rutherford v. UllmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swayze v. BrideMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Northcutt v. EagerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Eastman v. ThayerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880
  4. Daudt v. KeenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API