Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Potter v. Longeley
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 14, 1932No. [Nos. 43, 44, October Term, 1931.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
These appeals are from judgments in favor of defendants on demurrers, the plaintiffs refusing to- amend their declarations.
The two records are substantially identical. The explanation seems to be that two suits were necessary because two of defendants reside in Harford County and one in Baltimore City.
The declarations contain three counts, the first of which alleges that defendants, on -September 5th, 1929, owned, kept, and maintained a large quarry, which had been abandoned and was not actively operated at the time, near Biddison Lane and Belair Boad in the City of Baltimore, in a thickly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Simonton v. Citizens Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- State Ex Rel. Stansfield v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Grube v. Mayor, Etc., of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Mayor of Baltimore v. De Palma Ex Rel. De PalmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Betesh v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- Blackburn Ltd. Partnership v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Schiller v. Hecht Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Wells v. Henry W. Kuhs Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Murphy v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.