Legal Opinion
Transpacific Steel LLC v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 14, 2020No. 19-00009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 20-98 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRANSPACIFIC STEEL LLC, Plaintiff, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Gary S. Katzmann, and Jane A. Restani, BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU Judges SANAYI VE TICARET A.S., ET. AL Court No. 19-00009 Intervenor Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES ET AL., Defendants. OPINION [Proclamation 9772 imposing additional § 232 duties on Turkish steel violates statutorily mandated procedures and the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under law] Dated: July 14, 2020 Matthew M. Nolan and Russell A. Semmel, Arent Fox LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Transpacific Steel LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025
- Transpacific Steel LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020