Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Fontana

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1983No. 82 CA 0859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Judge.

Plaintiffs, owners of an undivided one-fifth interest of some property, appealed the judgment ordering a partition by licitation.

The issues are whether the property can be partitioned in kind and, if not, whether a minimum price should be set for its public sale.

We affirm.

Plaintiffs, as owners of an undivided one-fifth interest in a 22.02 acre tract of land, instituted suit against the defendants seeking a partition in kind. Because the named defendants had sold their four-fifths interest in the property to Theodore B. Blanchard, the latter was substituted as the proper party…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Raceland Bank & Trust Co. v. ToupsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Tri-State Concrete Co., Inc. v. StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. Babineaux v. BabineauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  4. National Amer. Bank of New Orleans v. ClevelandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Pryor v. DeshaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. TuttleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  2. Vuskovich v. ThorneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API