Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Muse

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1914No. 3183PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PBENDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.

On May 2, 1914, the grand jury of Cooke County duly indicted said Muse for a felony. On the same date the clerk issued the proper capias on said indictment under which the sheriff of Cooke County duly arrested and held said Muse. On May 27th appellant petitioned the district judge of Cooke County for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging the said indictment, capias, and that he was held by the sheriff thereunder, merely alleging that he was illegally restrained of his liberty and confined in the county jail of Cooke County by the sheriff. The judge at no time granted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte T.H. JenningsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Ex Parte DraneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Longmire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Ex Parte Mary SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API