State ex rel. West v. Price
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The orders denying the motions to compel discovery are subject to review on an appeal from the final judgment of the trial court. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Marshall, v. Keller (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 203, 205.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Marshall v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Daniels v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Henley v. LangerOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Orr v. CorriganOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State, Ex Rel. Fontaine v. Hanover Bd, TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State ex rel. Daniels v. Russo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.