Legal Opinion

State ex rel. West v. Price

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1980No. 79-1493PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The orders denying the motions to compel discovery are subject to review on an appeal from the final judgment of the trial court. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Marshall, v. Keller (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 203, 205.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Marshall v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Daniels v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Henley v. LangerOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Orr v. CorriganOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State, Ex Rel. Fontaine v. Hanover Bd, TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Daniels v. Russo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API