Brown v. Tuskegee Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Broadly speaking, the purpose of the suit in equity was to assert title and right of possession on behalf of the city of Tuskegee in an electric lighting system in possession of and being operated as a public utility by Tuskegee Light. & Power Company, a corporation. The original bill was filed March 18, 1933, by individual appellants, as citizens and taxpayers, making the city of Tuskegee, a municipal corporation, party respondent. The city, by answer and statutory cross-bill, admitted the substantial averments of the original bill, and sought the same, relief.
On final…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crampton v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Allen v. Intendant & Councilmen of LaFayetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Foote's Dixie Dandy, Inc. v. McHenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- City of Montgomery v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Alford v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- City of Decatur v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. BashamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.