Legal Opinion

Cromwell-Franklin Oil Co. v. Rushing

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1933No. 23900Published

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This is the second appeal to-this court from the State Industrial Commission by Cromwell-Franklin Oil Company and the U. S'. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, as petitioners, from an award made by the .Commission to one Robert Leo Rushing, who sustained an injury while working- for petitioners on the 2.7th day of December, 1930.

Claimant’s alleged injury was caused by the explosion of a gas line" Causing him to be blown some four or five feet. At the same time he received burns about his face and oyes which he claims resulted in a permanent partial loss of vision in both eyes. At the first hearing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cromwell-Franklin Oil Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API