Cromwell-Franklin Oil Co. v. Rushing
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This is the second appeal to-this court from the State Industrial Commission by Cromwell-Franklin Oil Company and the U. S'. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, as petitioners, from an award made by the .Commission to one Robert Leo Rushing, who sustained an injury while working- for petitioners on the 2.7th day of December, 1930.
Claimant’s alleged injury was caused by the explosion of a gas line" Causing him to be blown some four or five feet. At the same time he received burns about his face and oyes which he claims resulted in a permanent partial loss of vision in both eyes. At the first hearing…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cromwell-Franklin Oil Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932