Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.J.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 18, 2006No. Nos. 05-05-00682-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice THOMAS.

Mahbub Jamil Ananta (Father) challenges the trial court’s modification order naming Sharmeen Jamil Parvez (Mother) the sole managing conservator of the parties’ three children, contending the trial court abused its discretion by basing its ruling on factual findings that are not supported by the evidence. Father also petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its contempt order. We affirm the trial court’s order and deny mandamus relief.

Factual and Procedural Background

Father and Mother divorced in Dallas County on March 9, 2001.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lenz v. LenzTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re LongTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In the Interest of A.B.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. Brito Guevara v. Francisco CastroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
  4. In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API