Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allegheny Power Service Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2008No. 242 CD 2007Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

For the first time, this Court, in the majority opinion in this case, interprets Section 306(c)(23) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act)1 to allow a bilateral loss claimant to continue to receive total disability benefits, even though he has returned to work and is receiving wages.2 See generally Torrey & Greenberg, Workers’ Compensation: Law and Practice § 5:142 (West, 2002) (Torrey & Green-berg) (“No appellate authority exists which would permit a claimant to return to work, and have earning power, yet continue to receive temporary total…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Turner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Symons v. National Electric Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Reed v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API