Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rogers v. M.O. Bitner Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1987No. 19224Published

1ConcurrenceZimmerman, Justice

I write separately to state my reasons for joining in the Court’s finding that the fraudulent assignment of real estate contracts to Harold Bennett was part of the joint venture between Bitner Company and Westcor, thus making Bitner Company liable for losses flowing from those assignments. I think the majority’s conclusory holding on this point glosses over significant factual and legal issues and fails to provide satisfactory guidelines for future litigants.

Bitner Company argues that the development of the Park City subdivision and the assignment of sales contracts are separate and distinct…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strand v. CranneyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Saikin v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API