Legal Opinion

Johns v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1931Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The judgment of the circuit court was wrong. Where there has been a breach of agreement on the part of the landlord to make repairs, if the repairs are extensive and the cost excessive in comparison with the rent, the measure of the tenant’s damages is the diminution of the rental value of the property by reason of such nonrepair; but where the repairs are inexpensive as compared with the rent, the measure of the tenant’s damages is the cost of making such repairs. Young v. Berman, 96 Ark. 78, 131 S. W. 62, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 977 ; and Frank v. Rogers,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. BermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Morris v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Franks v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. National Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Bish v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API