United States v. Richard Larry Rusk, A/K/A Demetri Thor
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted of making a false written statement on a Treasury Department form in purchasing a gun, thereby violating 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a). The statement in question consisted of the representation to a firearms dealer in the purchase of a gun that appellant had not been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. This appeal followed and we affirm.
The form was signed in the name Richard Larry Rusk on August 9, 1971 by a person claiming to be Rusk. Appellant’s name was changed by a state court proceeding on May…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Lewis BlackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Lamartine Nazien, Lelio Saintil and Reynald MorelusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Demetri Thor and Richard Lynn BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Kevin Thomas FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Demetri Thor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Thomas J. BarfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. George Roger HeathCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.