Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Larry Rusk, A/K/A Demetri Thor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 25, 1975No. 74-3609PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant was convicted of making a false written statement on a Treasury Department form in purchasing a gun, thereby violating 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a). The statement in question consisted of the representation to a firearms dealer in the purchase of a gun that appellant had not been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. This appeal followed and we affirm.

The form was signed in the name Richard Larry Rusk on August 9, 1971 by a person claiming to be Rusk. Appellant’s name was changed by a state court proceeding on May…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Lewis BlackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Lamartine Nazien, Lelio Saintil and Reynald MorelusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Demetri Thor and Richard Lynn BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Kevin Thomas FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Demetri Thor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Thomas J. BarfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. George Roger HeathCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API