Legal Opinion

Bernardo Penoro v. Rederi A/b Disa and the Vessel Disa, Her Motors, Engines, Boilers, Gear and Tackle, Rederi A/b Disa, and Third-Party v. Cunard Steamship Company, Ltd., Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 13, 1970No. 31971Published

1Opinion of the Court

422 F.2d 392

Bernardo PENORO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

REDERI A/B DISA and the VESSEL DISA, her motors, engines, boilers, gear and tackle, Defendant-Appellee.

REDERI A/B DISA, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

CUNARD STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Ltd., Third-Party Defendant.

No. 344.

Docket 31971.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued December 15, 1969.

Decided January 13, 1970.

Diego Camarda, Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff-appellant.

William P. Kain, Jr., New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens and Thomas F. Molanphy, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before FRIENDLY,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mascuilli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carmelo Candiano v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. John W. McGrath Corp., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Fred Fredericks v. American Export Lines, Inc. S. J. Farrington Iron Works, Inc. v. John W. McGrath CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. United States v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank Stock Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Aaron Alexander v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and Third-Party v. International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API