State v. O'DONNELL
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the thoughtful and thorough opinion by Judge Skillman. State v. O’Donnell, 408 N.J.Super. 177, 974 A.2d 420 (App.Div.2009). We add only the following.
According to defendant Alice O’Donnell, the question presented in this appeal is “[wjhether the warrantless entry into defendant’s home for the specific purpose of searching and seizing evidence in a criminal murder investigation ... 30 to 45 minutes after the original emergency was over and the police had exited and secured the home” violated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SlockbowerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- State v. BoykinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- State v. DiloretoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of New Jersey v. Alice O'DonnellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- State of Tennessee v. Thomas Lee HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MINITEESupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- O'Donnell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.