Legal Opinion
United States v. Dom Scalzo, James Scalzo and Gary Scalzo
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 1, 1983No. 82-2543 to 82-2545PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Dom Scalzo, James Scalzo and Gary Scalzo, appeal the sentences imposed upon them following a plea agreement. They charge that the presentence investigation reports prepared for each of them, and especially the use of information contained in a confidential report, violated their rights under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3). We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
The appellants, Dom Scalzo, James Scalzo and Gary Scalzo, were indicted in February 1982 for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2315 (sale or receipt of stolen goods). 1 On June 7, 1982, the three were charged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Janice Weston, A/K/A Janice WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Thomas NesbittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Randall E. CoonceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Kenneth PetittoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Carletos E. Hardamon, Also Known as CjCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Anthony Leonard CusenzaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.