Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Jenkins
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 22, 2018No. 16-461Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
16‐461 United States v. Joseph Jenkins UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Carmine TramuntiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Angelo Amen, Mark A. Deleonardis, Michael Paradiso and Oreste Abbamonte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Terry FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Mark Boyce v. Soundview Technology Group, Inc. (Formerly Known as Wit Capital Group, Inc.), Docket No. 05-1685-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.