DeClue v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARY K. HOFF, Judge.
Richard DeClue (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing. State now concedes there was an insufficient factual basis for Movant’s guilty plea to the felony resisting arrest charge. We reverse and remand for the court to vacate and set aside Movant’s conviction for felony resisting arrest due to the insufficient factual basis for the plea.
Movant was charged by a second amended information with the class D felony of resisting arrest, Section 575.150 RSMo Cum.Supp.1996, and as a prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Hoskin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. FurneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. MortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. MerrittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Martin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. OrtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.