Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Amica Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 5, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action for judgment declaring which of the two defendant insurance companies should supply coverage for an accident which occurred on October 11, 1982, the defendant Arnica Mutual Insurance Company appeals, (1) as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated May 22, 1987, as upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order of the same court entered June 26, 1986, denying its cross motion for summary judgment, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated February 12, 1987, which granted the motion of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barile v. KavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Employers Commercial Union Insurance v. Firemen's Fund InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Eveready Insurance v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Allstate Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaplan v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rancich v. Cortland Co-Operative InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- USAA Casualty Insurance v. BelizaireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. New York Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005