Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dettinger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2009No. 2008-2440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, James Frederick Dettinger of Toledo, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0023637, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1974. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice for six months, all stayed on the condition of no further misconduct, based on findings that he accepted a loan from a client without disclosing the attendant risks of their conflicting interests. We agree that respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility as found by the board and that a six-month, conditionally…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. ParisiOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Lawrence L. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ShawOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Cincinnati Bar Association v. RobertsonOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Dayton Bar Assn. v. ParisiOhio Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API