H. Koehler & Co. v. Brady
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from Special Term, New' York County. Action by H. Koehler & Co. against James W. Brady. Plaintiff had judgment. Afterwards two supplemental judgments were entered. Later one Peter Doelger moved to set aside the judgments, and for leave "to intervene. Motion denied, and Doelger appeals. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.
1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.
The relief originally asked for in the complaint was to restrain the defendant, Brady, who was the owner of certain real estate, known as No. 228 East Forty-Fifth street, city of New York, from interfering with or disturbing the plaintiff’s possession of certain property upon such real property, and from interfering with the lease of the store, a portion of the property held and owned by the plaintiff, and from interfering with the possession of said premises by the plaintiff as tenant of said property. When the action was commenced, the plaintiff filed a notice of the pendency of the action.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mooney v. . N.Y. El. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Koehler v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- H. Koehler & Co. v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903