Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fuentes v. Warden

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 13, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00324Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JOE FUENTES, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:24-CV-324-JD-JEM WARDEN, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Joe Fuentes, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed an amended complaint. ECF 5. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Donald F. Greeno v. George DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API