Carollo v. Newton
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BARRY, Judge.
This tort action arises out of plaintiff’s death from electrocution which occurred while installing an air-conditioning motor.
Michael Carollo agreed to repair Edward Newton’s home central air-conditioning system. Carollo arrived around 10 a.m. and was met by Bernie Smithe, Newton’s room*207mate. After removing fuses to the outside condenser, but not those controlling electrical power to the attic, Carollo determined that the air-handling unit in the attic had a defective motor. Smithe helped him unscrew three mounting arms and remove the Emerson three speed single rotation, 240 volt…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loescher v. ParrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- United States v. Nassau Marine Corp., Central Marine Service and Canal Barge CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Broussard v. PA. MILLERS MUT. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Benny F. O'Neal v. International Paper Co., Defendant-Third Party v. Cleveland Wrecking Co. And Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Curtiss v. Northeast Utilities, No. Cv92-0511572-S (Dec. 5, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994