Legal Opinion

Carollo v. Newton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1986No. CA-4945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Judge.

This tort action arises out of plaintiff’s death from electrocution which occurred while installing an air-conditioning motor.

Michael Carollo agreed to repair Edward Newton’s home central air-conditioning system. Carollo arrived around 10 a.m. and was met by Bernie Smithe, Newton’s room*207mate. After removing fuses to the outside condenser, but not those controlling electrical power to the attic, Carollo determined that the air-handling unit in the attic had a defective motor. Smithe helped him unscrew three mounting arms and remove the Emerson three speed single rotation, 240 volt…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loescher v. ParrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. United States v. Nassau Marine Corp., Central Marine Service and Canal Barge CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Broussard v. PA. MILLERS MUT. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  5. Benny F. O'Neal v. International Paper Co., Defendant-Third Party v. Cleveland Wrecking Co. And Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Curtiss v. Northeast Utilities, No. Cv92-0511572-S (Dec. 5, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API