Legal Opinion

Brahan v. Debrell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1827PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE TAYLOR

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action of assumpsit by Debrell, the en-dorsee, against Brahan, the endorser of a bond.

It is assigned as error, that no sufficient breach is alleged in the declaration.

The declaration, after describing the bond and endorsement, and avering a demand, proceeds to state the liability and undertaking of Brahan, the endorser, to Debrell, to pay the money “according to the tenor and effect of the writing.” The breach alleged is, that Brahan did not pay the said Debrell “according to the tenor and effect of *15said writing.” It is true that…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reese v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  2. Jewett v. DringerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1879
  3. Warner v. WarnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1879
  4. Parker v. HaggertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API