Legal Opinion

Drew v. Metropolitan Sewer District

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 1, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00562Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE MICHAEL DREW PLAINTIFF vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00562-CRS-CHL METROPOLITAN SEWER DISTRICT, et al., DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Introduction This matter is before the Court on Defendant Metropolitan Sewer District’s (“MSD”) Objections to Magistrate Judge’s January 8, 2020 Discovery Order. DN 53. MSD only objects to the Magistrate Judge’s order with regard to eight documents he ordered produced. MSD argues that each document is protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Kathy Thomas v. Dorothy ArnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re Search Warrants Issued August 29, 1994District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API