BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co., Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED DECISION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT *
COHN, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction. 784
II. The’663 Patent.785
III. Preliminary Matters .787
A. The Motions For Summary Judgment.787
B. Other Motions.787
C. The Court Appointed Expert.788
D. The Parties’ Response to the Expert’s Report.789
E. Overview of Discussion.789
IV. The Law.790
A. Summary Judgment .790
B. Infringement Generally.790
C. Literal Infringement.790
D. File History Estoppel.790
E. Infringement by Equivalents.792
V. “A Single Crystal Of Piezoelectric Material:” A Reprise.792
A. File History.792
B. Definition of “A…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Taylor v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AGDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003